Politika.lv stands for quality and tolerant environment for online discussions. Politika.lv invites

World Politics Articles Research Resources Social Integration celia amoros in Articles Research Resources and Civil Society Participation Articles Research Resources Education and Employment Articles Research Resources
Rule of Law Articles Research Resources Fwd: Europe celia amoros EU Research Articles Other Resources About Us Mission and people Advertising Elections European elections 2014 Local elections 2013 elections to the 11th Saeima elections to the 10th 9th 8th elections and local government elections celia amoros and the European elections 2009 Local Government Elections 2005 Parliament Elections 2004
The French parliament passed celia amoros a resolution calling for ban on the wearing of parandžas country. Given the political power of consensus on this issue, there is no doubt that in the near future such a law will be adopted in France
Print France will become the second European country after Belgium to prohibit the total or partial suppression of the face. Surveys show that in many other European countries, such as Spain, Italy, UK, Germany, Netherlands majority of people support banning celia amoros parandžas. But not everyone supports the move. But if Islamists noisy opposition does not surprise anyone, and do not even bother anymore, celia amoros the few zealous liberals parandžas defense there are noteworthy. For example, the British magazine The Economist celia amoros criticized by French and Belgian action, making the lack of respect for Muslim women's individual choices and lack of tolerance celia amoros (The Economist, May 13, Banning the Burqa: A Bad Idea). The Economist warns that such laws may result in a wave of Islamophobia. The Economist arguments are lax and naive. Both parandža and its milder variant of the hijab (veil that leaves the face open) is discrimination against women and junior status symbols - but men are not required to completely shield your body! The majority of Muslim women in Europe should not wear religious beliefs, but because of the cruel relatives and various Muslim organizations and pressure. Laws that restrict the wearing of clothes, marks a public space that is free from religious spiediena.Tas allow Muslim women to develop unhindered contact with the wider society and the freedom to choose their lifestyle. In this context, those who oppose the wearing of religious symbols limitations in favor of the religious impact of free space narrowing. This has a negative impact on the freedom of choice as possible. In particular, such an approach is detrimental to those brave Muslim women who want to shape their lives according to Western liberal-secular celia amoros values, not the Koran dictations. celia amoros Western society has an obligation to help these women, rather than under the pretext of 'toleranci'un' respect for other cultures' leave her ultrakonservatīvo demagogues power. Not all types of tolerance is morally justified. Tolerance parandžu also means tolerance to the humiliation of women. This is all the clothes fit defended remember. As for the dangers of Islamophobia, which warns The Economist, then it is unlikely that walking through the streets parandžās it decreases. Fight against Islamophobia is not only Europeans but also the duty of Muslims. And it can not be done through their religiousness and aggressive imposition of endless complaining about the "racism" and "lack of sensitivity towards other cultures celia amoros and religions", but the adoption of European values and ideals, especially secularism and gender equality. celia amoros There can be no compromise. And thanks to France that again showed the right path.
Creative celia amoros Commons license that allows for free to republish the article, referring to authors and site politika.lv, but publication may not be amended or supplemented. We invite those of politika.lv!
More on this topic "Prosecutor" or "own"? Domburs changing identity on the way to the underwater part of the iceberg 0 04.08.2014. Author: Icarus Kubliņš If Latvia ban Russian television: what next? 16/03/2014 15. Author: Iveta Coat RUSSIA TODAY is the centaur 0 07.03.2014. Author: Tim Nastin VIDEO: Media and Information - quality or quantity? 0 01.09.2014. Author: Politika.lv VIDEO: Media content - wealth or cheap product? 12/16/2013 1. Author: Politika.lv Virtual Embassy - boom and decline of 0 06.06.2013. Author: Albert Anderson Prev
Politika.lv stands for quality and tolerant environment for online discussions. Politika.lv invites readers, writing comments, to comply with decency, and not call for racial hatred, and do not use abusive language. Politika.lv reserves the right to delete offensive comments celia amoros and denied commenting on the article. Declaration on respect, tolerance and co-operation of web space
Either the author is in complete ignorance of religion either done is something that no one sort or smoking a drink .. or too many naked women's breasts and buttocks watch .. no other option. :) How can you talk about things that have no slightest notion? This time I also do not understand it