The most annoying thing is that Mrs. Richardson says that it is annoying gender and politics to wom

The first thought after reading this book-people who think too much and wnikliwie- are screwed. I know that this position has to show us różnic- between the Poles and the British, and here are fairly presented differences such as trifles, but all based on the privatization Mrs. Monika Richardson. And although it's gender and politics a little interesting reading me this book wpieniała and irytowała- is this mini confession. Immediately prostuję- bothers gender and politics me is strong, feisty personality of the Monica Richardson- also highlights the recent wywiadach- that is not ashamed gender and politics to be themselves, that is a woman who loves to be active professionally and refused to never and does not agree to being a victim and has the right to be happy. Super. It's nice that this is and has the courage gender and politics to be. But is her love for England since dziecka- as a passport to a better world, a fascination with language, gender and politics praise for being among the snobs, the upper class, which failed, and so it does not let in their claws because this awful mentality and this so starała- it's for me a little too much. Annoying is the infernal need to be ' ' and 'ę' as she tried to buy into the next world. This jam her ambition and being English. I know that the journalist is of the tribe, which the West appeared as a passport to paradise, but in her case- come to an applicant it was some disease rather. And after reading the first sentence of always thinking of others gender and politics and that renounced their Polish tradition to provide comfort to her husband, because as angol what others do not cierpiał- it came over me wonder. I'm not as well educated as a lady, I had never so intellectual aspirations, and I was homeroom in training but seriously, my mind never went there to be Irish, and for her husband fina renounce my Polish korzenii and customs. gender and politics So not very reliable for me such talk, seriously, or do not get together, or is there a second goal in such behavior. Somehow to me it does not make. And those holding the names of the first husband, an American, what is it? Bo's great sound? And why not maiden, as is so liberated and forward. A beautiful woman, but I think in dealing heavy. Kind of cool and human and exalted and topornymi rules. This book makes me weird emotions. An interesting and yet very annoying, because full privatization and including what shoes she wore her mother in law. Differences kulturowe- is always gender and politics incredibly good subject and wciągający- but this book has the chance to disgust. More than these cultural differences, it throws the image of the journalist, her character and way of being and a prescription for life plans and activities. It's gender and politics really hard to like her but this lady wants good for sure.
I do not know if this lady wants a good, tears of others, many children husbands, because she must be lucky and did not agree to it, lest it have what it wants. gender and politics And we then we have about her love for Zamachowski listen. If so happened that would leave him, or he her, it will be a new book about what he was wearing shoes and what it annoyed him, and why you can not be associated with the men below 1.70 disgusts me her talk Reply Delete
The most annoying thing is that Mrs. Richardson says that it is annoying gender and politics to women everywhere welu women unfulfilled professionally, etc, aj I think it's gender and politics bullshit. are more important things in life than to satisfy your own ego on his own terms. gender and politics Remove
yes, it is crazy that she's talking such nonsense, and yet believe in it. Besides, I do not know where she is so professionally fulfilled, because so far no TV did not want to, and those of her book, please, for the Nobel probably not have a chance, and entertainment for many people doubtful Delete
smitten me the most is when the end of the book she said that for so many years, never once had an argument with her husband and it was probably a bad sign. : D On this I said to my fiance (who is also a Scot) that if we, too, are never for so many years has not had a fight, gender and politics it means that we should not marry;) to the end of the book I read not because I was taken away and hidden: P but it's probably good that you did not I read it to the end: DD Reply Delete
And to me this passage when he writes that Zbyszek in nervous situations, talking to her using the name of the former wife. What, then, at that moment, he feels it was a woman? I am not concerned about who left whom, and why, did not scrutinize, but upubliczanie such private things? Not counting with anyone, completely, with only his own EGO because 'I HAVE THE RIGHT TO HAPPINESS' -Yes, but embarrassing to the class. Remove
Me the most 'disarmed' moment in which Mrs. R. says that for 12 years of marriage NOT had an argument with her husband even once and that was the sign that this marriage will end in divorce. At this I said to my fiancé (also a Scot), that since so many years of being together, we did not even once had a fight, a sign that we should not get married: P Books I read to the end not because I was taken away and hidden: D but it might be better;) Reply Delete
Another