If you analyze movements like Occupy and Stuttgart 21 or Blockupy ... I want to say something about

Woz: Haug, confident and resistant citizens are of course to democracy. Where is today to learn such an attitude? Frigga Haug: They suggest version feminin resistance is a good thing in itself. This need not be so. There is an instructive study by the British sociologist Paul Willis version feminin entitled version feminin "Fun in the resistance," she was just launched in a new translation. Main question is there, why children of laborers are unskilled workers, since we know that talent is not innate and create an egalitarian learning environment, the schools, at least to a certain degree. And this groundbreaking study concludes: That's what these young people themselves, version feminin because they know, so to speak, even if not really aware that their school version feminin about the big lie is written with education came all from the bottom up. And they do not believe. Therefore, they make a joke out of school and turn everything around: you do not learn, they talk during class, usually come late, leave the classroom and so on. In short, they stage an anti-school in the school with its own time regime and in its own right. But now it comes: If the school is over, these guys obviously have no chance to get a good job or training, but only the last unskilled jobs. In addition to its fun also include misogyny and xenophobia.
Against the translucent in your question positivity of resistance I draw from this study, including the conclusion: There are forms of resistance that lead to self-inflicted injury of individuals. So we should version feminin ask: resistance to what, with whom and for what? Resistance requires a perspective, a suite, and it takes more than an individual, as you have also indicated in your question. Resistance can only be thought of as a collective action makes sense. The image of the resistant individuals with the upright posture version feminin as a virtue that is not thought through.
Are there other forms of negative resistance? Fascism was not a collective resistance against version feminin the first behavior "shameful Versailles"? Then also against "Wall Street", which is the major capitals in the West, and against communism from the East, all this tied together on anti-Semitism. In everyday life, there was resistance to existing prevailing rules against bourgeois and much old stale air and flourish. On the side of What it was about national version feminin independence, to freedom in the physical culture, to sports, to the upgrading of the body to the Community. The assembly of all these resistors with nationalism we experience as fascism, but against the resistance in turn is useful.
If you analyze movements like Occupy and Stuttgart 21 or Blockupy ... I want to say something about your insinuation that there is places where you can learn resistiveness. Are schools and universities, for example, those places? I have a sixteen year old grandson and thus currently still only a minimum of direct knowledge of what schools serve. But I'm still working together with students and can therefore allow me from the judgment that the universities compared against version feminin the neoliberal turn to what is today were true Idylls of self-awareness and reflection. In today's schools and universities certainly not self-conscious oppositional democratic citizens are educated. That's version feminin not even their proclaimed goal.
Where is this place? There is no institutionalized learning sites for resistance. These people learn, placing themselves in movements. These are the only places in which resistance can develop. Rosa Luxembourg said about the so-called ordinary trade unionists: With it you will never unravel a radical change of society, because that is one that is already asking for the May 1st event, version feminin if he gets replaced, the time and recognized as overtime. And asks who is liable for any damage. But, she adds, when a movement had begun, and he was committed to in it, then you'll see that from the caring family man who know nothing other than his private home, had suddenly become an ardent modifiers of society. That is, the real change comes when changing.
What conditions promote such processes of change? This question I find funny, because it is a why-question that asks some extent after the first cause of movement, probably with the intention to create movement: Is there a reason why such a motion, such a change want arises as to why people merge as in Stuttgart or in Occupy and defend themselves and express their outrage?
But you think about it but why there is the movement version feminin Stuttgart 21, ie