Opinions Info X What interests Authors Paul Šafr Petr Holec Jiří X. Dolezal Miroslav Cricket Ludek Stanek Bohumil Pečinka Bohumil Dolezal Tereza Spáčilová Milan Tesar Dan Gross Vojtěch Varyš Acts x 2013 Letters Other Cannabis Cup Cannabis Cup 2012 Cannabis Cup 2011 Acts X Acts Acts 2013 X 2012 X 2011 X Nudes Nudes Nudes X 2010 X 2009
My colleague Jan Jandourek politely and substantively responded to the article on the demographic threat and its relationship with the fashion boom of alternative sexual cara membakar lemak life. Since imitation is the truest form of flattery, I will try to do the same.
"For little children can not gays and lesbians. Heterosexuals is to blame," writes Jan Jandourek. This is tricky. (What bisexuals? Are they to blame half?) Perhaps you can agree that the cause of the low number of children are people who either have no children or have few. If their sexual preference zoofilní, pedophile, homosexual, onomatopoeic, straight or with blueberry sauce, it really does not matter: the result is always the same.
JAN Jandourek: For little children can not gays and lesbians. It is the fault of heterosexuals colleague Daniel Deyl total factually described the problem of our society. We have a few children. He reached him but the issue of homosexual persons, which is misleading. September 4, 2013 - Jan Jandourek full article cara membakar lemak
Why does this by Jana Jandourka not guilty of being gay, not precisely, but perhaps it can be reconstructed. To me, it's taken a liberal (Christian, he would be) human decency, which would eklovalo instruct another person, what, how, with whom and with what result has to do in his bedroom. Gay for her orientation and was not under human dignity by trying to change him, punishing him for it, or otherwise demean. It's a good argument; deny it is to deny the fundamental values of liberal democracy, which no one wants to here about.
So we probably agree that it is good to have a liberal democracy and at the same time is a bit stupid disappear. This gives rise to the idea logically, although not individual homosexuals as above not criticize the unwitting carriers of at least passively something malicious. Or, at least completely, these people are deprived of one of the basic ways to contribute to human existence.
So be it. But where are therefore takes gay pride? What pride, what? The march disabled proud not to his human nature or size, but just on my disability? One will involuntarily recall Haškova brilliant statement that "if the worst Austria, each must be crippled in its place".
"Daniel Deyl criticizes the current mentality in Western countries and says: 'This progressive liberal thinking has a clear attempt to separate sexuality from reproduction and family to replace a set of independently cara membakar lemak deciding individuals to other individuals. Yet this is a goal that needs to achieve his tolerance of the existing order. Wants the existing order and to replace other regulations; wants to make a revolution, which would go much deeper than French or Bolshevik revolution. simply do not want to disturb social order, but also biological. '
It is possible to say much about that homosexuals can say what they want, but it's pretty unlikely that someone managed to cancel the 'biological order', because it either is or is not, your way you will find as well, "says Jan Jandourek.
That's why I do not write "gay" but "progressive liberal thinking", the two components that relate to the topic is gay propaganda and campaign for equalization of women. Both of these components are involved in the creation of that demographic hell, into which precisely lesions.
Biological order to find a way of course, but you can influence it, unfortunately. The sudden decline of the European Jewish population during the first half of the 40th years is not a manifestation of the biological order which found its way, but a foolish human decision consecutively directly against that order. The fact that every thousand Chinese people today are 545 men and 455 women owe their origin to the biological order, but his absurd denial. Still others, but similarly destructive idiocy is nowadays too. That the biological order find a way to lethality of doing much diminish. I thought someone would say critic cara membakar lemak of the Holocaust "Well jeez, however, would like to find a way"?
"I do not expect that someone will like girls and because of real or perceived gay propaganda reorientation. Likewise, no one exchanged marriage with someone of the opposite cara membakar lemak sex registered partnership just because it can."
This argument is based on the assumption of numerical superiority hundred cara membakar lemak percent hetero-or homosexually oriented people who actually nothing to change the orientation minds. However, we know that, for example in prisons, where a) ambition to behave heterosexually faces external obstacles, and therefore b) homosexual behavior is accompanied by social stigma, homosexual behavior is doing much better than at large (perhaps cara membakar lemak with the exception of the Old Town, such as author has the ability cara membakar lemak to occasionally watch). It seems, then, that human sexual behavior - including at the orientation
